home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nic.hookup.net!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!pacbell.com!amdahl!JUTS!ccc.amdahl.com
- From: tjc50@ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)
- Newsgroups: misc.legal,misc.legal.computing,misc.int-property,comp.patents,misc.answers,comp.answers,news.answers
- Subject: Copyright Law FAQ (4/6): International aspects
- Summary: This article contains frequently asked questions
- (FAQ) with answers relating to copyright law,
- particularly that of the United States.
- Message-ID: <law/Copyright-FAQ-4-757882188@ccc.amdahl.com>
- Date: 6 Jan 94 18:51:01 GMT
- Expires: 7 Feb 94 17:49:48 GMT
- References: <law/Copyright-FAQ-1-757882188@ccc.amdahl.com>
- Sender: tjc50@juts.ccc.amdahl.com
- Reply-To: tjc50@ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)
- Followup-To: misc.legal
- Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA
- Lines: 305
- Approved: pjt@eos.research.canon.oz.au,news-answers-request@mit.edu
- Supersedes: <law/Copyright-FAQ-4-756152534@ccc.amdahl.com>
- Xref: bloom-beacon.mit.edu misc.legal:30505 misc.legal.computing:3215 misc.int-property:1838 comp.patents:322 misc.answers:367 comp.answers:3306 news.answers:13782
-
- Posted-By: auto-faq 2.4
- Archive-name: law/Copyright-FAQ/part4
-
- FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT COPYRIGHT (V. 1.1.3)
- Part 4 - International aspects.
-
- Copyright 1994 Terry Carroll
- (c) 1994 Terry Carroll
-
- Last update: January 6, 1994.
-
- This article is the fourth in a series of six articles that contains
- frequently asked questions (FAQ) with answers relating to copyright law,
- particularly that of the United States. It is posted to the Usenet
- misc.legal, misc.legal.computing, misc.int-property, comp.patents,
- misc.answers, comp.answers, and news.answers newsgroups monthly, on or
- near the 17th of each month.
-
- This FAQ is available for anonymous FTP from rtfm.mit.edu [18.70.0.209],
- in directory /pub/usenet/news.answers/law/Copyright-FAQ, files part1 -
- part6. If you do not have direct access by FTP, you can obtain a copy
- via email: send a message to mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu with the following
- lines in it:
-
- send usenet/news.answers/law/Copyright-FAQ/part1
- send usenet/news.answers/law/Copyright-FAQ/part2
- send usenet/news.answers/law/Copyright-FAQ/part3
- send usenet/news.answers/law/Copyright-FAQ/part4
- send usenet/news.answers/law/Copyright-FAQ/part5
- send usenet/news.answers/law/Copyright-FAQ/part6
- quit
-
-
- DISCLAIMER - PLEASE READ.
-
- This article is Copyright 1994 by Terry Carroll. It may be freely
- redistributed in its entirety provided that this copyright notice is not
- removed. It may not be sold for profit or incorporated in commercial
- documents without the written permission of the copyright holder.
- Permission is expressly granted for this document to be made available
- for file transfer from installations offering unrestricted anonymous file
- transfer on the Internet. Permission is further granted for this
- document to be made available for file transfer in the data libraries of
- associated with the following Compuserve Information Services fora: the
- Legal Forum, the Desktop Publishing Forum, the Show Business Forum, and
- the Ideas, Invention & Innovation Forum. This article is provided as is
- without any express or implied warranty. Nothing in this article
- represents the views of Santa Clara University or of the Santa Clara
- Computer and High Technology Law Journal.
-
- While all information in this article is believed to be correct at the
- time of writing, this article is for educational purposes only and does
- not purport to provide legal advice. If you require legal advice, you
- should consult with a legal practitioner licensed to practice in your
- jurisdiction.
-
- Terry Carroll, the FAQ-maintainer, is a computer professional, and is
- currently (January 1994) a student in his final semester at Santa Clara
- University School of Law, is currently Editor-in-Chief of the Santa Clara
- Computer and High Technology Law Journal, and is seeking employment as an
- attorney.
-
- If you have any additions, corrections, or suggestions for improvement to
- this FAQ, please send them to one of the following addresses, in order of
- preference:
-
- 71550.133@compuserve.com
- tcarroll@scuacc.scu.edu
-
- I will accept suggestions for questions to be added to the FAQ, but
- please be aware that I will be more receptive to questions that are
- accompanied by answers. :-)
-
-
- FAQ ORGANIZATION.
-
- The following table indicates the contents of each of the parts of the
- FAQ.
-
- Part 1 - Introduction (including full table of contents).
- Part 2 - Copyright basics.
- Part 3 - Common miscellaneous questions.
- Part 4 - International aspects.
- Part 5 - Further copyright resources.
- Part 6 - Appendix: A note about legal citation form, or, "What's
- all this '17 U.S.C. 107' and '977 F.2d 1510' stuff?"
-
- TABLE OF CONTENTS (for this part).
-
- Part 4 - International aspects.
-
- 4.1) What international treaties exist governing copyright, or
- "What is this Berne Convention I keep hearing about?"
- 4.2) Is Freedonia a signatory to either the Berne Convention or to
- the Universal Copyright Convention?
-
-
- 4.1) What international treaties exist governing copyright, or "What is
- this Berne Convention I keep hearing about?"
-
- The two major treaties governing copyright are the Berne Convention (U.S.
- Senate Treaty Doc. 99-27, KAV 2245, 1 B.D.I.E.L. 715; also reprinted at
- 17 U.S.C.A. 104). and the Universal Copyright Convention (U.C.C.), (25
- U.S.T. 1341, T.I.A.S. 7868, 1 B.D.I.E.L. 813 (1971 Paris text); and 6
- U.S.T. 2731, T.I.A.S. 3324, 216 U.N.T.S. 132 (1952 Geneva text)). (Note:
- the abbreviation U.C.C. to denote the Universal Copyright Convention
- should not be confused with the same abbreviation to denote the Uniform
- Commercial Code.)
-
- The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works
- was established in 1886 in Berne, Switzerland. The text has been
- revised, and the current edition (and the one to which the United States
- and most other nations are a signatory) is the 1971 Paris text. The
- treaty is administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization
- (WIPO), an international organization headquartered in Geneva,
- Switzerland.
-
- The Berne Convention has four main points: National treatment,
- preclusion of formalities, minimum terms of protection, and minimum
- exclusive rights.
-
- National treatment: Under Berne, an author's rights are respected in
- another country as though the author were a national (citizen) of that
- country (Art. 5(1)). For example, works by U.S. authors are protected by
- French copyright in France, and vice versa, because both the U.S. and
- France are signatories to Berne.
-
- Preclusion of formalities: Under Berne, copyright cannot be dependent on
- formalities such as registration or copyright notice (Art. 5(2)).
- However, as noted in sections 2.5 and 2.7, this provision apparently does
- not prevent a member nation from taking adherence to formalities into
- account when determining what remedies apply.
-
- Minimum terms of protection: Under Berne, the minimum duration for
- copyright protection is the life of the author plus 50 years (Art. 7(1)).
- Signatory nations may have provide longer durations if they so choose.
-
- Minimum exclusive rights: Under Berne, a nation must provide for
- protection of six rights: translation (Art. 8(1)), reproduction (Art.
- 9(1)), public performance (Art. 11(1), and Art. 11ter), adaptation (Art.
- 12), paternity (Art. 6bis(1)) and integrity (Art. 6bis(1)). In certain
- of these areas, U.S. copyright law does not quite align with Berne. For
- example, Berne requires that the paternity and integrity rights endure
- for the same term as the other rights (Art. 6bis(2)), while in the U.S.,
- those rights terminate at the death of the author (17 U.S.C. 106A(e)).
- The two have been reconciled by the premise that other sources of federal
- law, such as trademark, combined with the trademark, unfair competition,
- and defamation laws of the individual states, satisfy these requirements.
-
- The Universal Copyright Convention was originally written in 1952 in
- Geneva. It became effective in 1955. Like the Berne Convention, the
- text has been revised. As with the Berne Convention, the most recent
- revision was in Paris in 1971. The United States is party to both the
- 1952 Geneva text and the 1971 Paris text. The U.C.C. is administered by
- UNESCO, a United Nations agency.
-
- Like Berne, the UCC requires national treatment for authors. However,
- the UCC differs from Berne in four material ways. First, the UCC permits
- (but does not require) member states to require formalities such as
- copyright notice and registration as a condition of copyright (Art. III).
- Second, copyright duration must be until least 25 years after the
- author's death or after the first publication, depending on whether a
- nation calculates duration based on the author's life or on publication
- (Art. IV). Third, the UCC's provisions on minimum rights are
- considerably less demanding than Berne's; the UCC demands recognition
- only of the rights to reproduce, adapt, and to publicly perform or
- broadcast the work. Furthermore, the UCC expressly permits a nation to
- make exceptions to these rights, as long as the exceptions do not
- conflict with the spirit of the treaty (Art. IVbis). Fourth and finally,
- the UCC recognizes the Berne Convention, and includes language so that,
- between two nations which are signatories to both Berne and the UCC, the
- Berne Convention controls and the UCC does not apply. Furthermore, if a
- nation is a signatory to both conventions, and withdraws from Berne, it
- will not be protected by the UCC (Art. XVII and Appendix). These
- provisions were added by nations fearing that creation of the UCC in 1955
- would undermine the already existing Berne Convention.
-
- The United States was the primary mover behind the creation of the
- U.C.C., because the formalities that existed in U.S. copyright law at
- that time did not permit adherence to Berne. With the U.S. joining
- Berne, and consequently abandoning the formalities that were the driving
- force behind the U.C.C., the significance of the U.C.C. is waning.
-
- In addition to Berne and the UCC, other copyright treaties include the
- 1971 Geneva Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms
- Against Unauthorized Duplication of Their Phonograms (25 U.S.T. 309,
- T.I.A.S. 7808, 888 U.N.T.S. 67), the 1984 Brussels Convention Relating to
- the Distribution of Programme-Carrying Signals Transmitted by Satellite
- (T.I.A.S. 11078), and the 1911 Buenos Aires Convention on Literary and
- Artistic Copyrights (38 Stat. 1785, T.S. 593, 1 Bevans 758), which
- regulated copyright in the Americas. The U.S. did not sign the Buenos
- Aires Convention when it was revised in 1948, and all of its signatories
- are now also signatories to either or both of Berne or the UCC. The
- Buenos Aires Convention is now essentially a dead letter in international
- copyright law.
-
- The texts of both versions of the U.C.C., the Buenos Aires Convention,
- and the Geneva Convention, are in Circular 38c, "International Copyright
- Conventions," available from the Copyright Office (see section 5.1).
- Texts of the Berne Convention and the U.C.C. are available by anonymous
- FTP from the Multilaterals Project (see section 5.2).
-
-
- 4.2) Is Freedonia a signatory to either the Berne Convention or to the
- Universal Copyright Convention?
-
- The answer in section 4.1 is generally almost always followed by a query
- as to whether a specific country has signed one or more of the
- conventions, so the following lists provide that information.
-
- This data comes from the January 1992 edition (the most current) of
- Treaties In Force, with some supplemental information as noted. Each
- list indicates only that the nations listed have signed the convention.
- It does not indicate whether a particular nation has also signed one or
- more of the optional protocols associated with the convention. For
- example, Protocol 1 of the U.C.C. establishes that stateless persons are
- to be considered nationals of the nation within which they reside for
- purposes of the convention; a number of nations have signed the U.C.C.,
- but have not signed that protocol. If you really want to get down to
- that level of detail, consult a current edition of Treaties In Force.
-
- If you're interested in knowing more detail about what copyright treaties
- are in effect between the U.S. and a particular nation, there is a table
- in the back of Treaties In Force containing an alphabetical list of
- countries, listing the copyright treaties (both unilateral and
- multilateral) to which it is a party with the U.S., including the dates
- on which each treaty entered into force. This table is also reproduced
- in the Copyright Office's Circular 38a, "International Copyright
- Relations of the United States," contains You can order it from the
- Copyright Office (see section 5.1). This circular is also included in
- Copyright Office information kit 100. A similar table is included as an
- appendix in the Nimmer treatise (see section 5.1).
-
- Note that, while the U.S.S.R. is listed as a signatory to the 1952 Geneva
- text of the U.C.C., the status of the former soviet states is unclear at
- this time. I've been told that Russia and some of the other newly
- independent states have announced that they will honor nearly all of the
- treaties of the former Soviet Union. Other states, for example, Estonia,
- Latvia, and Lithuania, take the position that they were never legally
- part of the Soviet Union, and that treaties entered into by the Soviet
- Union are totally irrelevant to their international obligations.
-
- In addition, I've been cited to an article entitled "Post-Soviet Law: The
- Case of Intellectual Property Law," by Peter Maggs (an attorney and
- professor at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) in the Harriman
- Institute Forum, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Nov. 1991), pp. 3-9. Professor Maggs
- reportedly concludes that, under international law, all newly independent
- states that were previously legitimate parts of the USSR (i.e., all
- except Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), remain bound by the UCC, although
- whether they actually have functional copyright protection is another
- matter altogether.
-
- Thank you to <marlen@sovam.com> for contacting Professor Maggs and
- providing me with most of the information in the preceding two
- paragraphs.
-
- In addition, in May 1993, the TASS news agency reported that Russia has
- enacted a new copyright law that is Berne-compliant, in preparation for
- an anticipated signing of the Berne Convention.
-
- The following nations are signatories to the Berne Convention (1971 Paris
- text): Argentina, Australia, Austria, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belgium,
- Benin (formerly Dahomey), Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso (formerly Upper
- Volta), Cameroon, Canada, the Central African Republic, Chad, Chile,
- Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast), Cyprus,
- Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon,
- Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Holy See (Vatican City), Honduras,
- Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lebanon, Lesotho,
- Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Madagascar (Malagasy
- Republic), Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico,
- Monaco, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Pakistan,
- Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, South
- Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka (formerly Ceylon), Suriname, Sweden,
- Switzerland, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, the
- United Kingdom, the United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Yugoslavia, Zaire,
- and Zimbabwe. According to U.S. State Department Dispatches published
- since January 1992, additional nations to sign Berne include Gambia (Dec.
- 12, 1992), China (July 10, 1992) and Kenya (March 11, 1993).
-
- The following nations are signatories to the Universal Copyright
- Convention (1971 Paris text): Algeria, Australia, Austria, the Bahamas,
- Bangladesh, Barbados, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Colombia,
- Costa Rica, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, the Dominican Republic,
- Ecuador, El Salvador, France, Germany, Grenada, Guinea, Hungary, Italy,
- Japan, Kenya, Korea, Mexico, Monaco, Morocco, the Netherlands, Norway,
- Panama, Poland, Portugal, St. Lucia, St, Vincent and the Grenadines,
- Senegal, Seychelles, Spain, Sri Lanka (formerly Ceylon), Sweden, Trinidad
- and Tobago, the United Kingdom, the United States, Vatican City, and
- Yugoslavia.
-
- The following nations are signatories to the Universal Copyright
- Convention (1952 Geneva text): Algeria, Andorra, Argentina, Australia,
- Austria, the Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Bolivia,
- Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa
- Rica, Cuba, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, the Dominican Republic,
- Ecuador, El Salvador, Fiji, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece,
- Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Holy See, Hungary, Iceland,
- India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Laos, Lebanon,
- Liberia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malawi, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico,
- Monaco, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria,
- Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, St. Lucia,
- St, Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Seychelles, Spain, Sri Lanka
- (formerly Ceylon), Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, the Union of the Soviet
- Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom, the United States, Venezuela,
- Yugoslavia, and Zambia.
-